Standards
Editorial Policy
Short, specific and enforceable. Every rule here is one you could catch us breaking.
By Scooter M., enthusiast, crease control · Published
This page exists so the standards are checkable rather than implied. Each rule below is written so that a reader could point at a page and say we had broken it — which is the only kind of editorial policy worth publishing.
1. We never claim to have tested a product
The words tested, hands-on, tried, we used and put through its paces do not appear on this site in reference to any product. We have not handled these units. Claiming otherwise would be a fabrication, an FTC deception, and the single easiest claim in this category for anyone to falsify. The method page sets out what we do instead.
2. No number is written from memory
Every wattage, tank capacity, heat-up time, weight and dimension on this site was read off the product's own listing during the research pass, and each product page links back to that listing. Where a maker publishes nothing, the page says Not published rather than filling in a plausible figure.
3. Prices come from the live layer or not at all
A price on this site is either fresher than 48 hours or it is not shown. There is no third state. When there is no live price the button reads Check price on Amazon, because a stale price is a wrong price and a wrong price is worse than none.
4. Fabric claims are cited
Every claim about how a fabric behaves under steam cites a fiber-property reference, a manufacturer's care guidance, or the federal care-labeling rule. No fabric claim here rests on personal experience, because we have not steamed these fabrics with these machines.
5. We have no reviews or testimonials, and we publish none
This is a new publication with no reader reviews. There is therefore no testimonials section anywhere on this site, and there will not be one until there is something real to put in it. We also emit no `Review` or `AggregateRating` structured data of our own — the on-page score is an editorial spec score and marking it up as a review rating would assert an evaluation we did not perform.
6. Third-party testing is attributed, never borrowed
Where another publisher has bought and tested products, we say so by name and link to them. We do not paraphrase their findings into our own voice, and we do not reproduce ratings that sit behind a paywall. Someone else's work is not our evidence.
7. Every comparison names a loser
Every roundup includes at least one product we would not buy, and every product page carries a who should not buy it line. Every head-to-head answers *who should buy the other one*. A page on which everything is recommended recommends nothing.
8. Commercial pressure does not move a ranking
Positions come from a rubric published in full, computed from figures the makers publish. It is public precisely so that a ranking bent toward commission would be visible. Our linen verdict recommends an iron on the highest-demand fabric question in the category, and earns us nothing.
9. The author is described honestly
The byline is Scooter M., enthusiast. Not expert, not specialist, not veteran, not a number of years, and not a credential. Framing the author by interest rather than tenure is the only description that is true, and a description that is true is worth more than one that sounds impressive.
10. Corrections are made in the open
If something here is wrong, tell us at `info@creasecontrol.com` and it gets fixed. Substantive corrections are noted on the page. `Last updated` dates move only when the content actually changed — we do not bump a date to look fresh, because that would make the one signal we ask you to trust meaningless.
11. How this site is written
- Answer first, then explain. The verdict is in the first forty words, not after nine hundred.
- Say where the number came from. A figure without a source is an assertion.
- Name the conflict of interest when there is one — including ours.
- Plain words. Wrinkles, not creasing concerns. Buy, not invest in.
- No manufactured urgency. No countdowns, no deal panic, no exclamation marks.
12. Reader data
We use analytics to see which pages help people, and the contact form sends a message to one inbox. Nothing is sold and nothing is shared beyond what is needed to run the site. The privacy policy has the detail.
Questions people actually ask
+Does Crease Control test the products it reviews?
No, and the word tested does not appear on this site in reference to any product. The method is published specifications, cited to their source, with the scoring rubric public.
+How do you handle corrections?
Email us and it gets fixed, with substantive corrections noted on the page. Last-updated dates move only when the content actually changed.
+Why are there no customer reviews on this site?
Because we have none. This is a new publication, and a testimonials section would have to be invented. There will be one when there is something real to put in it.