Skip to content
Crease Control

Compare

Conair vs Beautural

The clearest illustration on the site of the power-versus-tank trade, in two machines.

By Scooter M., enthusiast, crease control · Published

A clothes steamer and an iron side by side

Conair: more steam, less of it. Beautural: less steam, more of it. The Conair's 1,875 watts handles cotton shirting and tailoring that the Beautural's 1,200 will fight with; the Beautural's 260 ml tank runs longer per fill than the Conair's 216 ml, and consumes it more slowly besides. If your wardrobe is cotton and wool, take the Conair. If it is knits, synthetics and silk, take the Beautural.

We earn a commission if you buy through the links on this page, at no extra cost to you. It does not change which steamer we rank first — the ranking comes from published specifications and the arithmetic on our method page. We have not tested these units. Full disclosure.

Side by side

Published figures
Conair Turbo ExtremeSteamBeautural 1200W
Power1,875 W1,200 W
Tank216 ml260 ml
Heat-up40 s30 s
Weight2.27 lb2 lb
Warranty2 yearsNot published
Cotton shirtingComfortableWorkable, more passes
LinenStill an iron jobStill an iron job
Silk, knits, syntheticsFineFine, and gentler

Where the wattage genuinely matters

Cotton. It is the fabric that separates a real steamer from a fabric refresher, because cellulose fibers hold a wrinkle firmly and need energy to release it. On a poplin dress shirt the Conair does in one pass what the Beautural does in two or three. On a jersey T-shirt neither difference is visible.

Neither handles linen, and no handheld does, so that fabric is not a tiebreaker.

Where the tank genuinely matters

Everywhere else. 260 ml against 216 ml is a twenty per cent larger tank, and because the Beautural draws two-thirds the power it consumes that water more slowly — so the real run-time difference is larger than the capacity figures suggest. If you find refilling the thing that stops you steaming, the Beautural is the more pleasant machine.

The two, side by side

Ranked on published specifications. Tap a row for the full write-up; the price button goes to Amazon.

#ProductBest forSpec scorePrice
1Conair Turbo ExtremeSteam GS59Conair Turbo ExtremeSteam GS59The most-bought handheld in the category, and its published specs explain that rather than contradict it.The default handheld6.5/10
2Beautural 1200W Handheld SteamerBeautural 1200W Handheld Steamer260 ml on a 1,200W handheld — the most run time per fill here, bought with output.The biggest tank in the class5.7/10

The picks in full

Conair Turbo ExtremeSteam GS59 — Conair product photo

1. Handheld · The default handheld

Conair Turbo ExtremeSteam GS59

The most-bought handheld in the category, and its published specs explain that rather than contradict it.

6.5/10Power 10.0Tank 4.6Heat-up 7.3Portability 3.7

Computed from published specifications only — the rubric is published in full.

$69.73 · View on Amazon

#ad · how this is funded · price as of September 16, 2026

Published specifications

ModelGS59L
Power1,875 W
Tank216 ml
Heat-up40 s
Weight2.27 lb
Voltage110V
Dimensions8"L x 5.6"W x 13.6"H
WarrantyLimited 2 year.

Source: Conair published specifications (Amazon listing), accessed September 2026.

What the numbers mean

1,875 watts is the practical ceiling for a plug-in appliance on a US 15-amp circuit, and this unit sits right at it. Power is what turns water into dry steam fast enough to relax a fiber instead of soaking it, so on a handheld this is the figure that matters most.

The trade is the tank. 7.3 fluid ounces is a shade over 200 ml, which Conair pairs with a stated 20 minutes of run time. Call it two or three shirts before a refill.

40 seconds to heat is ordinary for this power class, not fast. The Rowenta Pure Force publishes a tenth of that at the same wattage.

Good

  • 1,875W is the most power available in a handheld on a US circuit
  • Three attachments in the box, including a fabric brush for wool and a crease tool
  • Two-year limited warranty, which is unusual at this price

Not good

  • The tank is small for the power — high output empties it faster
  • 40-second heat-up is beaten by several cheaper units
  • Over two pounds in the hand, which tells after a few garments

Who should not buy it. Skip this if you steam a whole rail at a time. At full output the tank runs dry before you get through a week of shirts, and a standing unit with a two-liter tank costs about the same.

Beautural 1200W Handheld Steamer — BEAUTURAL product photo

2. Handheld · The biggest tank in the class

Beautural 1200W Handheld Steamer

260 ml on a 1,200W handheld — the most run time per fill here, bought with output.

5.7/10Power 4.3Tank 6.4Heat-up 8.2Portability 4.8

Computed from published specifications only — the rubric is published in full.

$36.97 · View on Amazon

#ad · how this is funded · price as of September 16, 2026

Published specifications

Model722NA-0001
Power1,200 W
Tank260 ml
Heat-up30 s
Weight2 lb
Voltage120V
Dimensions6"L x 4.3"W x 10.7"H
WarrantyManufacture warranty

Source: BEAUTURAL published specifications (Amazon listing), accessed September 2026.

What the numbers mean

Tank capacity decides whether steaming is pleasant or annoying, and this carries 260 ml against the 190 to 216 ml the 1,875W units manage. More minutes per fill, fewer trips to the sink.

1,200 watts is a real step down from 1,875. On linen and heavy cotton you will feel it — the steam is wetter and you will make more passes. On the synthetics and knits that make up most wardrobes the difference is small.

Two pounds and 30 seconds to heat are both mid-table. Nothing here is remarkable except the tank, and the tank is the point.

Good

  • 260 ml — the largest handheld tank in this set
  • 30-second published heat-up, faster than the 1,875W Conair
  • Auto shut-off published as part of a nine-point safety design

Not good

  • 1,200W struggles where 1,875W does not — linen especially
  • Filling means carrying the whole unit to the tap
  • Two pounds in the hand, the same as the far more powerful Conair

Who should not buy it. Skip this if linen or heavy cotton is most of what you own. Below about 1,500 watts you make three passes where a stronger unit makes one.

Questions people actually ask

+Conair or Beautural garment steamer?

Conair for cotton shirting and tailoring, where 1,875 W does in one pass what 1,200 W does in three. Beautural for knits, synthetics and silk, where the 260 ml tank and the gentler output are worth more than peak wattage.

+Is 1,200 watts enough for a garment steamer?

For most wardrobes, yes. It handles knits, synthetics, silk, wool and light cotton. Heavy cotton twill needs more, and linen needs an iron whatever the wattage.

+Which has the longer run time?

The Beautural. It carries 260 ml against 216, and it consumes water more slowly because it draws two-thirds the power — so the real difference is larger than the capacity figures alone suggest.